Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use: industrial use & Water Use: Mining/Extraction support

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (2) - Ecosystems (2) - Governance (2) - Values and Norms (1) - Water Quality (2) - Water Quantity (1)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (2) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (1) - Dry-summer (1) - Dry-winter (1) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (1) - Moist (1) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (2) - Monsoon (2) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (3) - alpine (1) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (1)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Agriculture or Irrigation - Domestic/Urban Supply - Fisheries - farmed - Fisheries - wild - Hydropower Generation - Industry - consumptive use - Industry - non-consumptive use - Livestock - Mining/Extraction support - Other Ecological Services - Recreation or Tourism - Other - None

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (1) - Cultural Interest (1) - Development/humanitarian interest (1) - Environmental interest (2) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (2) - Industry/Corporate Interest (2) - Local Government (1) - Non-legislative governmental agency (2) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (3) - Supranational union (1)

Key Question:

- How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1)

Showing below up to 4 results in range #1 to #4.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)